Image classification from raw photos to reviewable results
Plan the collection, transformations, evaluation groups, and review process behind a meaningful visual classification.
Read the guide ↗VISION & IMAGERY
Imagery Neuro Browser
Learn to manage visual evidence with source information, captions, rights, and a clear distinction between a picture and its interpretation.
TOPIC GUIDE / 04 · READ, QUESTION, EXPLORE
Keep the image connected to its source
A useful visual record includes where an image came from, what it is intended to show, and which changes have been applied. Distinguish an original acquisition from a cropped illustration or a model-created visualization. Avoid presenting a decorative neural graphic as an actual scan or measurement. The visuals on this site illustrate concepts rather than clinical findings.
Write captions that limit ambiguity
Describe the visible content and the role it plays in the argument. State when scale, acquisition details, or source context are unknown. For a research note, link the visual to the surrounding methods or dataset documentation rather than saving only a thumbnail. A reviewer should understand what the image supports and what remains outside its scope.
Three questions to take with you
01Is the image an illustration or an observation?
02What transformations were applied?
03Does the caption preserve necessary context?
Reference for this topic: W3C provenance overview. Read the original context alongside the guide.